Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lettieri v. Garver
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
RANDALL E. GARVER and MICHAEL MOCKWATER
Lettieri v. Matson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Karen Matson, The Broome County Humane Society, David Gaska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-761
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RANDALL E. GARVER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-676
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI, (John Doe)
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WYOMING COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Lettieri v. Garver
as 24-205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDALL E. GARVER and MICHAEL MOCKWATER
Lettieri v. United States Department of Justice
as 23-8061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RANDALL E. GARVER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Lettieri v. Garver et al
as 1:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Randall E. Garver and Michael Mockwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Garver et al
as 9:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Randall E. Garver and Michael Mockwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. United States Department of Justice
as 23-7036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RANDALL E. GARVER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Lettieri v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Buearu of Investigation, Wyoming County Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
