Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Graves v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03230
Plaintiff:
MOTIQUE GRAVES and Malik Tyquarn Graves
Defendant:
The City of New York, City of New York Police Department, P.O. CHRISTIAN SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Spencer (Reese)
as 18-1056
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J., Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti, Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Deshawn Reese, AKA Day Day
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Spencer (Beverly)
as 12-3636
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deshawn Reese, AKA Day Day, Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti, Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx
United States of America v. Spencer (Reese)
as 12-3631
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti, Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J., Christopher Brown, AKA X and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Deshawn Reese, AKA Day Day and Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx
United States of America v. Spencer (Luciano)
as 11-1163
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J., Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx, Christopher Brown, AKA X and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti
Termini v. Roelle et al
as 7:2007cv10483
Plaintiff:
Anne Termini
Defendant:
Robert J. Roelle, Raymond Sanchez, Zoila Tazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Excelsior Affiliation Corp. et al v. Cruz et al
as 1:2007cv04440
Plaintiff:
The Excelsior Affiliation Corp. and John Steven Sosa
Defendant:
Crystal Cruz, Manuel De La Cruz, Mildred Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
