Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Prince v. Reinhart et al
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Raymond Prince
Defendant:
Reinhart and Paul Piccolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 6:2021cv06604
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Piccolo, Hill, S White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, A. Rodriguez, Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Piccolo
as 21-1255
Defendant / Appellee:
James Ciulla, Paul Piccolo, Gregory Stachowski, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Bradshaw
Bradshaw v. Piccolo et al
as 6:2021cv06050
Defendant:
Jonathon Spence, Christopher Clark, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. 309 Rte 100 Dover LLC
as 20-4093
Appellee:
NEC Financial Services, LLC, LPV, 15-Hermitage, LLC, Vermont Department of Taxes and others
Appellant:
James R. Barnes, Creditor and Equity Holder
Widrick v. Montage Resources Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv09101
Defendant:
D. Martin Phillips, John K. Reinhart, Montage Resources Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Widrick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
