Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Williams v. Hilton et al
as 1:2023cv08955
Petitioner:
Ronald Williams
Respondent:
Dep. Hilton, D. Vennetozzi and M. Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Hilton et al
as 1:2023cv10320
Petitioner:
Ronald Williams
Respondent:
Dep. Hilton, D. Vennetozzi and M. Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. The City of New York
as 1:2023cv03250
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Reyes
as 22-2647
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald Williams, Miguel Angel Gonzalez and Alfredo Rojas, AKA Wilfredo Nazario Roman
Defendant / Appellant:
Baudilio Reyes, AKA Braulio Reyes
United States of America v. Campbell (Williams)
as 22-1224
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leon Campbell
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Williams
Williams v. Keyless LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04440
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
Keyless LLC and N.Y. Residential Property Works LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Rhodes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10544
Plaintiff:
James Rhodes, William Rice, Wendell Ritchie and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Chemdesign Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Persaud et al v. Adirondacks Protection Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv08115
Plaintiff:
Anthony Persaud, Adrian Holder and Romano Chotkoe
Defendant:
Adirondacks Protection Services, LLC, Colin Blackman, Ronald Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Williams
as 21-2033
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
