Cases 1 - 10 of 502
Esses v. Rosen et al
as 1:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
Regina Esses
Defendant:
Tanya Rosen and Tanya Rosen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rosen v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
Marianna Rosen
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and Cyclace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosen v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 1:2024cv02673
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and CYCLACE
Other:
MARIANNA ROSEN and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Rosen v. AutographCOA, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Rosen
Defendant:
AutographCOA, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rosen v. Live Auctioneers, LLC
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Rosen
Defendant:
Live Auctioneers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Scott v. FaZe Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
FaZe Holdings Inc., Angela Dalton, Mickie Rosen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Foley et al v. Lafarge S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv05691
Plaintiff:
Diane Foley, John W Foley, John E Foley and others
Defendant:
Lafarge S.A., Lafarge Cement Holding Limited and Lafarge Cement Syria S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alexander v. Gleeson et al
as 1:2023cv05663
Plaintiff:
Owen Marlon Alexander
Defendant:
Andreea Gleeson, TuneCore Inc., Devon Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roberts v. New York State et al
as 1:2023cv04839
Defendant:
Administrative Service Officer, New York State, New York State U.I.A.B. and others
Plaintiff:
John Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
