Cases 1 - 10 of 1,461
Woods v. DOE et al
as 6:2024cv06347
Plaintiff:
Lumumba Woods
Defendant:
Superintendent JOHN DOE, Dep. Kelly, Dsp K VanNote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00529
Petitioner:
Jerrod Hunter
Respondent:
Superintendent Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfonso v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06341
Petitioner:
Santiago Alfonso
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. Superintendent
as 6:2024cv06334
Petitioner:
Chanikka Davis Payne
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06318
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kearse v. Kopp
as 1:2024cv04015
Petitioner:
Howard Kearse
Respondent:
Superintendent M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montes v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Miller, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06305
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barkley et al v. Ottisville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03647
Plaintiff:
Jouheedah A. Barkley and Peter Barkley
Defendant:
Ottisville Correctional Facility and Correctional Officers Superintendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
