Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Basbanes et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Basbanes, Nicholas Ngagoyeanes and Nicholas A. Basbanes
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI GP, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Jonathan Alter and Authors Guild
Cross Plaintiff:
Paul Tremblay, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
Cross Defendant:
DAVID HENRY HWANG
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sancton v. OpenAI Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10211
Plaintiff:
Julian Sancton, Rich Cohen, James Shapiro and others
Defendant:
OpenAI Inc., OpenAI GP, LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC and others
Interested Party:
Authors Guild, David Baldacci, Mary Bly and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al v. Internet Archive et al
as 1:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
HarperCollins Publishers LLC, Hachette Book Group, Inc., Penguin Random House LLC and others
Defendant:
Internet Archive and Does 1 Through 5
Amicus Curiae:
Library Futures Institute, EveryLibrary Institute, and ReadersFirst, AMICI CURIAE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS, Michelle M Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chronicle Books, LLC et al v. Audible, Inc.
as 1:2019cv07913
Plaintiff:
Chronicle Books, LLC, Harpercollins Publishers LLC, Hachette Book Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Audible, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
The Authors Guild, Inc. and Association of Authors' Representatives, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
as 13-4829
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mitgang, Daniel Hoffman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Paul Dickson and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Betty Miles, Jim Bouton, The Authors Guild and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Google, Inc.
In re: Literary Works in Electronic Databases Copyright Litigation
as 1:2000md01379
Defendant:
Reed Elsevier , Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive, LLC , The Dialog Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Inc.
Objector:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
as 12-3200
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mitgang, Daniel Hoffman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Paul Dickson and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jim Bouton and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Google, Inc.
The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
as 12-2402
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mitgang, Daniel Hoffman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Paul Dickson and others
Petitioner:
Google, Inc.
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Betty Miles, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joseph Goulden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jim Bouton and others
The Authors Guild, Inc. et al v. Hathitrust et al
as 1:2011cv06351
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Inc. , The Australian Society Of Authors Limited , Union Des Ecrivaines Et Des Ecrivains Quebecois and others
Defendant:
Hathitrust, The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, The Regents of the University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Authors Guild et al v. Google Inc.
as 1:2005cv08136
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Herbert Mitgang, Betty Miles and others
Appellant:
Lewis Hyde, Harry Lewis, Open Access Trust Inc. and others
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Jack Beerman, Privacy Authors and Publishers, Gary Rhoades and others
Not Classified By Court:
David Meininger, Harold Bloom, Elliot Abrams and others
Interested Party:
Olswang LLP and United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
New York Law School, Institute for Information Law and Policy, Computer and Communications Industry Association, Consumer Watchdog and others
Trustee:
Peter Gollasch
Intervenor:
Harrasowitz, Media24, Norstedts Forlagsgrupp AB and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
