Cases 1 - 10 of 2,668
Rojas v. Burger King Company LLC
as 1:2024cv04525
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rojas
Defendant:
Burger King Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Reid v. The City of New York
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC REID
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, MARTHA W. KING, In their official and individual capacity, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., In their official and individual capacity and others
King v. Exactech, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03844
Plaintiff:
Linda King
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. The City of New York
as 24-1388
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Former Mayor of New York City, ERIC GONZALEZ, Kings County District Attorney and others
Burrell v. Bell
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
EARL BELL, Superintendent CCF, WEBB, Education Supervisor of CCF, KING, Deputy Superintendent of Programs and others
Abellard v. M.J. King
as 1:2024cv03719
Plaintiff:
Euzebelin Abellards
Defendant:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Broadway 340 Madison Fee LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03865
Defendant:
Bo Guards Mechanicals LLC, Broadway 340 Madison Fee LLC, McCloskey Mechanical Contractors Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
King Rose of NY Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc Diversity - Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
