Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Magnuson v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07541
Plaintiff: Jennifer Lynn Magnuson
Defendant: Associated Newspapers, Ltd. doing business as Daily Mail doing business as www.dailymail.co.uk, Does 1-10 and Associated Newspapers, Ltd. a United Kingdom company doing business as Daily Mail doing business as www.dailymail.co.uk
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Magnuson v. Comcast Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07512
Plaintiff: Jennifer Lynn Magnuson
Defendant: Comcast Corporation, Does 1-10, Sky Group, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kuhmstedt v. News Group Newspapers Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06892
Plaintiff: Bernhard Kuhmstedt
Defendant: News Group Newspapers Limited, News Enterprises, Inc., Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
CipherBlade, LLC, et al v. CipherBlade, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05671
Plaintiff: CipherBlade, LLC, a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Corporation and CipherBlade, Ltd., a United Kingdom limited company
Defendant: CipherBlade, LLC, an Alaska Limited Liability Corporation,, Manuel Kriz, Michael Krause and others
Nixon v. Guardian Media Group PLC et al
as 1:2023cv05207
Plaintiff: Roderick Nixon
Defendant: Guardian Media Group PLC doing business as Guardian Nigeria, Does 1-10 and Guardian Media Group PLC a United Kingdom public limited company doing business as Guardian Nigeria
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lewis v. The Government of England and the United Kingdom
as 23-544
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marion T.D. Lewis, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: The Government of England and the United Kingdom, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United Kingdom and The Institution of the British Monarchy or The Crown, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United King
Lewis v. The Government of England and the United Kingdom
as 23-500
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marion T.D. Lewis, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: The Government of England and the United Kingdom, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United Kingdom and The Institution of the British Monarchy or The Crown, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United King
Lewis v. The Government of England and the United Kingdom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10792
Lead Plaintiff: T Marion Lewis
Defendant: Attorney General UK Victoria Prentiss, Solicitor General Michael Tomlinson, The Government of England and the United Kingdom and others
Plaintiff: Marion T.D. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Dwyer v. United Kingdom General Communications Headquarters
as 22-3012
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas F. Dwyer
Defendant / Appellee: United Kingdom General Communications Headquarters (UKGCHQ) and Malcolm John Tombs
Johnson v. Tunecore
as 22-2006
Petitioner: Robert W. Johnson
Respondent: Tunecore, iTunes, Apple Music and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?