Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Neor et al v. Acacia Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04814
Plaintiff:
Giitou Neor and Tyrone Wallace
Defendant:
Acacia Network, Inc. doing business as Acacia Network, Acacia Network Housing Inc. doing business as Acacia Network, Promesa Residential Health Care Facility, Inc. doing business as Promesa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wallace v. Session
as 18-835
Petitioner:
Oneil Tyrone Wallace, AKA Oneil Wallace
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III
Wallace v. Sessions
as 17-3407
Petitioner:
Oneil Tyrone Wallace, AKA Oneil Wallace
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III
Wallace v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv03259
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wallace, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wallace et al v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers et al
as 1:2014cv03821
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wallace, Nimani Publishing and Nimani Entertainment Group & Niami Entertainment
Defendant:
American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers, Sheral D. Jones, Robert G. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wallace v. Holder
as 14-439
Petitioner:
Oneil Tyrone Wallace, AKA Oneil Wallace
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wallace v. Holder
as 12-5103
Petitioner:
Oneil Tyrone Wallace, AKA Oneil Wallace
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Wallace v. Holder
as 12-955
Petitioner:
Oneil Tyrone Wallace, AKA Oneil Wallace
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Wallace v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv04387
Plaintiff:
Tyron Wallace
Defendant:
City of New York, Raymond W. Kelly, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
