Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,689
Sikder v. Garland
as 24-1362
Petitioner: MOHAMMED LOKMAN SIKDER, FARJANA AKTER, MOHAMMED SAFWAN SIKDER and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Cecias v. Garland
as 24-1367
Petitioner: DONNY ANDRE RODRIGUEZ-CECIAS, KARLA STEPHANIE MIRANDA-MANRIQUE and EITHAN SEBASTIAN RODRIGUEZ-MIRANDA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03632
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reyes-Chavarria v. Garland
as 24-1315
Petitioner: KENIA JOLIBETH REYES-CHAVARRIA, ALLAN OMAR RUIZ-REYES and KENIA FLORIDALMA RUIZ-REYES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morales Alarcon v. Garland
as 24-1323
Petitioner: HECTOR MARCIAL MORALES ALARCON
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03761
Plaintiff: Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Defendant: United States of America, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant: RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant: JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1291
Petitioner: LOVEJEET SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lobato Quito v. Garland
as 24-1297
Petitioner: MILTON WLADIMIR LOBATO QUITO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?