Cases 1 - 10 of 440,284
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv04258
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Roche Diabetes Care, Inc. et al v. JMD Enterprises et al
as 1:2024cv03625
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Bey v. Mecury Insurance (Trustee)
as 2:2024cv03787
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
LaDuke v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00748
Petitioner:
Robert LaDuke
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 9:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail, Robert Maciol, Patternoster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MT Hawley Insurance Company v. Tri County Marine Contractor of Florida, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04256
Plaintiff:
MT Hawley Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tri County Marine Contractor of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Mutti USA Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv04309
Plaintiff:
Mutti USA Inc.
Defendant:
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
AHP Servicing LLC v. Metasource LLC
as 1:2024cv04315
Plaintiff:
AHP Servicing LLC doing business as AHP Mortgage Direct
Defendant:
Metasource LLC
Counter Defendant:
AHP Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Motorcars Leasing, LLC v. M&M Auto & Towing,Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04313
Plaintiff:
Motorcars Leasing, LLC
Defendant:
M&M Auto & Towing,Inc. and Hugo J. Hernandez Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
