Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Efthymiou v. Alpine Overhead Doors, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00920
Defendant:
Alpine Overhead Doors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Efthymiou
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith et al v. Overhead Doors of Albany, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith and Michael Smith
Defendant:
Overhead Doors of Albany, Inc., David Ripley and Ken Harrington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Overhead Door Corp. v. Norwalk Overhead Door Company, LLC
as 3:2013cv00808
Plaintiff:
Overhead Door Corp.
Defendant:
Norwalk Overhead Door Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Trustees of Empire State Carpenters Annuity, Apprenticeship, Labor-Management Cooperation, Pension and Welfare Funds v. Overhead Door Company of Erie County
as 2:2012cv05652
Defendant:
Overhead Door Company of Erie County
Plaintiff:
Trustees of Empire State Carpenters Annuity, Apprenticeship, Labor-Management Cooperation, Pension and Welfare Funds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Tolbert et al v. Wabash National Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv01221
Plaintiff:
Martie Tolbert and Annie Tolbert
Defendant:
Wabash National Corporation , Americold Logistics, LLC and Overhead Door Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goss v. JLG Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Goss
Defendant:
JLG Industries, Inc., JLG Industries, Inc., Overhead Door Company of Lewistown, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Craven et al v. Overhead Door Corp.
as 3:2007cv00721
Plaintiff:
Kerrie Craven and Walter Craven
Defendant:
Overhead Door Corp., Overhead Door Corp. and Overhead Door Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
