Cases 1 - 10 of 829
Jaime v. New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision et al
as 1:2024cv03763
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Sullivan Correctional Facility, Doctor Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Searchers Group, Inc. v. The Serum Doctor, LLC
as 1:2024cv03576
Plaintiff:
The Searchers Group, Inc.
Defendant:
The Serum Doctor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds Diversity-Contract Dispute
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
STEDMAN, Nurse, KATHRYN CARHART, Nurse, RALPH, Nurse and others
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Peralta v. Khouri
as 1:2024cv02760
Plaintiff:
Jimy J. Peralta
Defendant:
Doctor Khouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs v. Venettozzi
as 24-841
Plaintiff:
DARNELL TUBBS
Defendant:
DONALD G. UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, PAUL P. WOODRUFF, Deputy Superintendent of Security at Upstate Correctional Facility, WAYNE GARLAND, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
