Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Morris Williams v. Phares Hutton, et al
as 13-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PHARES HUTTON, Hom. Division, GEORGE ADAMSON, Deputy Coroner, J. PERPER, M.D. and others
Jamie Elliott v. Grace, et al
as 12-4225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE ELLIOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. GRACE, Warden, WEAVERLING, C.O.I. HARMER and others
Michael Forrest v. Nedab, et al
as 12-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Willis v. Dragovich, et al
as 12-3527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN DRAGOVICH, SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Christopher Reed v. Craig Harpster, et al
as 12-3212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM REED
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG HARPSTER, Unit Manager, JEFFERY ROCKOVAN, Grievance Coordinator, JAMES D. MORRIS, Major and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Monroe Merritt v. Alan B. Fogel
as 11-4058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONROE MERRITT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY S. REESE, Corrections Health Care Administrator, STANLEY FALOR, MICHELE L. HOWARD-DIGGS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BYUNGHAK JIN
Anthony Morris v. Warden Perry Phelps, et al
as 11-3387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, Warden, ATTY GEN DE and STATE OF DELAWARE
Shawn Wright v. Jim Liguori
as 11-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM LIGUORI, LIGUORI MORRIS & YIENGST and WACHOVIA BANK NATL ASSN
Andrew Bickel v. Gordon Miller, et al
as 11-2987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW C. BICKEL
Defendant - Appellee:
GORDON R. MILLER, Judge, TIM LEWIS, Warden, MORRIS WADE, Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
