Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Corey Fallen v. Thomas McEnroe, et al
as 23-2312
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COREY FALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS MCENROE, in his individual capacity, CITY OF NEWARK, CHIEF SHEILAH A. COLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH HADLEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Ronald Koons, et al v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON SIEGEL, JASON COOK, JOSEPH DELUCA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RONALD KOONS, NICHOLAS GAUDIO, JEFFREY M. MULLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Not Yet Classified:
PRESIDENT NEW JERSEY STATE SENATE and SPEAKER OF THE NEW JERSEY GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Appellee:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Amicus Curiae:
IAN AYRES, FREDERICK VARS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Ronald Koons, et al v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-1900
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RONALD KOONS, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Not Yet Classified:
PRESIDENT NEW JERSEY STATE SENATE and SPEAKER OF THE NEW JERSEY GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Jane Me, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE ME, JANE ME1 and JON ROE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Defendant:
JUDGE LESLEY ADAMS, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT INC, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE MATTHEW ALBENCE, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge and others
Ralph Baker v. Michael Wittevrongel, et al
as 22-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WITTEVRONGEL, CITY OF UNION TOWNSHIP, SGT. RANDY STRATTON and others
Defendant:
JENNIFER F. BANAAG, YOLANDA CICCONE, FRANCIS P. BARLETTO and others
Ashley Ortiz v. New Jersey State Police, et al
as 17-3095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY ORTIZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, JOSEPH RICK FUENTES, in his capacity as Superintendent of New Jersey State Police, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and others
Emil Jutrowski v. Township of Riverdale, et al
as 17-2594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMIL JUTROWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF RIVERDALE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, by and Through the New Jersey State Police, JEFFREY HEIMBACH, New Jersey State Police Trooper, Individually and in his reperesentative capacity as a State Police Officer and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BIRO, individually and in his representative capacity as a sergeant employed by the Riverdale Police Department, CHIEF THOMAS SOULES, in his representative capacity as Chief of the Riverdale Police Department and TRAVIS ROEMMELE, individually and in his representative capacity as a Riverdale Police Officer
Corey Bland, et al v. City of Newark, et al
as 17-2229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COREY BLAND and VIRGINA BLAND
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS DELMAURO, DAVID MARTINEZ and RUBEN TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others
Debtor - Appellee:
WILLIAM LEGG
Corey Bland, et al v. City of Newark, et al
as 17-2228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COREY BLAND and VIRGINA BLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS DELMAURO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JAMES THOMPSON and others
Debtor - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEGG
Kathryn Van Orden v. Borough of Woodstown, et al
as 16-4295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHRYN M. VAN ORDEN, Individually and as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Celena J. Sylvestri
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF WOODSTOWN, COUNTY OF SALEM, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
