Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Deandre Jones v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 24-2158
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE PAYTON JONES
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY INDIANA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jonathan Jones v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Christopher Jones v. William Miller, et al
as 23-1230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NATHAN JONES, a/k/a Noble Christo El
Defendant:
WILLIAM TODD MILLER, A.L.J.S.C. d/b/a Honorable William Todd Miller, WARDEN ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, MR. D. ECKERD, Atlantic Co. Sheriff's Office agent of Sgt. D. Eckerd and others
Curtis Jones v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 22-2854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Jovan Jones v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 22-1359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOVAN JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Bryant Jones v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, et al
as 22-1115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYANT JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Donald Jones v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 17-2185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD SYLVESTER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Ronald Jones v. State of Delaware
as 17-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE
Michael Jones v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 17-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
