Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Rando Saavedra-Ramirez v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1738
Plaintiff:
RANDO SAAVEDRA-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN LORETTO FCI
Frederick Banks v. BOP, et al
as 24-1478
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gerrett Conover v. United States Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
GERRETT CONOVER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI
Sushovan Hussain v. Warden Allenwood FCI, et al
as 22-1604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSHOVAN HUSSAIN, aka Hasan Tareque
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI, DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald Totaro v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 17-3613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD N. TOTARO
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Jose Rodriguez-Ramos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-3630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ-RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and FORT DIX FCI
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 15-2948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, And all its agents, employees, contractors and custodian
Hurgenes Pignard v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 15-2369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HURGENES PIGNARD
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Justin Credico v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 15-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC, DIRECTOR BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
