Cases 101 - 110 of 2,894
Warren Raffensberger v. Lancaster County Public Defenders Office
as 24-1160
Plaintiff:
WARREN H. RAFFENSBERGER
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Michael Mokshefski v. Morris Houser, et al
as 23-3256
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOKSHEFSKI
Defendant:
MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent SCI-Benner Township, BRADLEY BOOHER, Deputy Superintendent SCI-Benner Township, CURTIS D. GRICE, Deputy Superintendent SCI-Benner Township and others
Clyde Pontefract v. BOP, et al
as 23-3142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE PONTEFRACT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, Supervisor, Fort Dix
Naree Abdullah, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1015
Plaintiff:
NAREE ABDULLAH, A/K/A GRENILE GAINEY and ERIC GREENE, A/K/A ERIC GREENE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, YVONNE RUIZ, OFFICER JOSEPH WALSH and others
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
Quentin Salmond v. Nathan Williams, et al
as 23-3131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUENTIN SALMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Detlef Hartmann v. Shane Troxler, et al
as 23-3207
Plaintiff:
DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant:
SHANE TROXLER, DOC, BC OP, WARDEN ROBERT MAY and STATE OF DELAWARE
Barrett Tunsil v. Harry Laurel, et al
as 23-3124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRY LAUREL, PA-DOC Secretary/C.E.O., WELLPATH INC, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, c/o Michelle Henry and others
Defendant:
AUKER, Medical Director/Administrator, BAKER, Medical Director/Administrator, BECK, Medical Director/Administrator and others
Jerome Washington v. Myers, et al
as 23-3032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. MYERS and SUPERINTENDENT SALAMON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
