Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Amos Tate v. Schember, et al
as 19-3026
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIE POLICE TRAFFIC DIVISION CAPTAIN, MAYOR SCHEMBER, ERIE PA SOLICITOR BETZA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMOS TATE
Defendant:
OWNERS OF MCMILLAN TOWING
Myron Moton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2773
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SWIFT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Roscoe Chambers v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 19-2879
Defendant:
SIA FOSNUT, DR. PARNESS, JESSIE AYERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Hasan Shareef v. Moore, et al
as 19-2793
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. BLUMMING, SGT. WAGNER, OFFICER BRIAN PALKO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HASAN SHAREEF
Shavez HoldenIn re: Shavez Holden
as 19-2687
Not Yet Classified:
SGT. KOPCHICK, C.O. 2, S.C.I. Forest, In re: SHAWVEZ NELSON A/K/A SHAVEZ HOLDEN, ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, Chief Hearing Examiner and others
Richard Sears v. Dante McCoy, et al
as 19-2673
Defendant / Appellee:
DANTE MCCOY, E. BAUMBACH, Deputy Superintendent facility manager, BRIAN CARPENTIER, RHU Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD SEARS
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 19-2338
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID EBBERT, J. GILLY, Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Justin Hickox v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2135
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT BALL, JOHN E. WETZEL, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN M. HICKOX
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Sean Marler, et al
as 19-2153
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL DEPT STAFF, F.D.C.- PHILA., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DIRECTOR, F.B.O.P., COMMISSARY DEPT STAFF, F.D.C. - PHILA. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Kevin Epperson v. Wilfred Beckles, et al
as 19-2232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN S. EPPERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WILFRED BECKLES, CAPTAIN DOTSON, DAUM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
