Cases 111 - 120 of 439
Darrell Prince v. United States Government, et al
as 17-1482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gerald Fisher v. USA
as 17-1299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD LEE FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Office of the Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Andrew Bonner, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Darlene Esposito v. HUD, et al
as 17-1079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARLENE R. ESPOSITO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CHASAN LEYNER & LAMPARELLO and JUDICIAL INTERVENTION PROGRAM NEW YORK SUPREME COURT CIVIL TERM CHIEF CLERK
Darrell Prince v. USA, et al
as 17-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES
Jacquelyn N'Jai v. EPA, et al
as 16-4431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELYN B. N'JAI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ANNIE HOYT, GARY BENTZ and others
George Johnson, Jr. v. Jonathan Rardin, et al
as 16-4279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE E. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN P. RARDIN, Esq., SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, JOE CASEY, in their individual as well as their official capacity as state actors and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
