Cases 171 - 180 of 6,264
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN P DIDDY COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aaron Bressi v. Northumberland County Court, et al
as 24-1130
Plaintiff:
AARON J. BRESSI
Defendant:
NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Robinson v. Northumberland County, et al
as 23-3254
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, ANTHONY MATULEWICZ, GOVERNOR JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO and others
Moses President v. Government of the Virgin Islands, et al
as 24-1112
Plaintiff:
DETECTIVE MOSES PRESIDENT
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, VIRGIN ISLANDS POLICE DEPARTMENT, VIRGIN ISLANDS TERRITORIAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY and others
Gina Russomanno v. Sumitomo Pharma America Inc, et al
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
GINA RUSSOMANNO
Defendant:
SUMITOMO PHARMA AMERICA INC, (SMPA) for affiliate, Sunovion Parmaceuticals, Inc. and SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Shonda Brown-Stewart v. Hackensack University Medical Center, et al
as 24-1162
Plaintiff:
SHONDA BROWN-STEWART
Defendant:
HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Transource Pennsylvania LLC v. Steven DeFrank, et al
as 24-1045
Plaintiff:
TRANSOURCE PENNSYLVANIA LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN M. DEFRANK, Chairman, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, KIMBERLY M. BARROW, Vice Chairman, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, JOHN F. COLEMAN, JR., Commissioner, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
