Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Miguelina Pena v. City of Lancaster, et al
as 22-1320
Plaintiff / Appellee: MIGUELINA PENA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RICARDO MUNOZ, DECEASED
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF LANCASTER, a municipal corporation, JARRAD BERKIHISER, in his individual and official capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF LANCASTER, KARSON ARNOLD, in his individual and official capacity as police officer for the CITY OF LANCASTER and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Ted McCracken v. Jacqueline McCracken Blei, et al
as 22-1289
Plaintiff / Appellant: TED AARON MCCRACKEN
Defendant: JACQUELINE MCCRACKEN BLEI, SUED IN HER OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, JOSEPH BLEI, SUED IN HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, PATRICK MOLLOY, CHIEF ABINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUED IN HIS OFFICIALAND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, a/k/a JOHN DOE 1 and others
Brian Errington v. City of Reading, et al
as 22-1073
Plaintiff / Appellant: OFFICER BRIAN ERRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF READING, agent of READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD TORNIELLI, in his individually capacity and official capacity as Chief of Police, Reading Police Department, ERIC DRIESBACH, in his individually capacity and official capacity as Lieutenant for Reading Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3596
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Anthony Falco v. Dawn Zimmer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3396
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY P. FALCO, as Chief of Police of the City of Hoboken and individually
Defendant - Appellee: DAWN ZIMMER, in her capacity as Mayor of the City of Hoboken and individually and CITY OF HOBOKEN, a municipal corporation
Defendant: JON TOOKE, in his capacity as Director of Public Safety for the City of Hoboken and individually
John Newsome v. City of Newark, et al
as 17-3142
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN NEWSOME
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF NEWARK, SHEILAH COLEY, Chief of Police, SAMUEL DEMAIO, Director of Police and others
James Lear v. Phoenixville Police Department, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES LEAR
Defendant - Appellee: PHOENIXVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, WILLIAM J MOSSMAN, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police and others
Richard Rivera v. Lake Como, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2204
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee: LAKE COMO, KEVIN E. JONES, JR., ALEX FAY and others
Michael Sauers v. Borough of Nesquehoning, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1591
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL SAUERS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Carola R. Sauers, deceased
Defendant - Appellee: BOROUGH OF NESQUEHONING and SEAN SMITH, Chief of Police
Defendant - Appellant: STEPHEN HOMANKO, Officer
Lena Davenport v. Borough of Homestead, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3892
Plaintiff - Appellee: LENA DAVENPORT, an adult individual
Defendant - Non-Participating: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, a Municipal corporation, NATHAN HARPER, Commander, in his official capacity as a Chief of Police of the City of Pittsburgh, BOROUGH OF HOMESTEAD, a Municipal Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: LOUIS SCHWEITZER, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh, STEPHEN MATAKOVICH, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh, CALVIN KENNEDY, individually and in his official capacities as a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh and others
Defendant - Appellee: IGOR BOYKO, individually and in his official capacity of a Police Officer of the City of Pittsburgh

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?