Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,264
William Murphy, et al v. State of Delaware Justices of the Peace, et al
as 24-1710
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MURPHY, individually and as guardian ad litem on behalf of A.T. and K.M. and TANISHA MURPHY
Defendant: STATE OF DELAWARE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, THE HONORABLE ALAN DAVIS, in his official capacity only as Chief Magistrate of the Justices of the Peace, CONSTABLE HUGH CRAIG, individually and in his official capacity as a Constable of the Justices of the Peace and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1717
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Lisa Lenihan
as 24-1432
Plaintiff: JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant: LISA P. LENIHAN
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff: PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant: MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Terri Lauchle v. United Parcel Service
as 24-1488
Plaintiff: TERRI LAUCHLE
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Appellant: GREGORY A. STAPP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rafaella Spone v. Matthew Reiss, et al
as 24-1684
Plaintiff: RAFAELLA MARIE SPONE
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW REISS, LOUIS BELL, TOWNSHIP OF HILLTOWN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1701
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1685
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peter Seamon v. Governor Joshua Shapiro, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff: PETER R. SEAMON
Defendant: GOVERNOR JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, NANCY WALKER, Secretary of Labor & Industry, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?