Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Joseph Drake v. USA, et al
as 22-2342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH F. DRAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, USP CANAAN and others
Darnell Doss v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-1919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL LAMONT DOSS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Christopher Alsop v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-1933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. ALSOP
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sushovan Hussain v. Warden Allenwood FCI, et al
as 22-1604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSHOVAN HUSSAIN, aka Hasan Tareque
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI, DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Ronald Totaro v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 17-3613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD N. TOTARO
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-3030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Department of Corrections, DEPUTY WARDEN CHRISTOPHER KLIEN, Assistant Deputy to Commissioner, MICHAEL DELOY, Bureau of Prisons, Bureau Chief and others
Robert Friedland v. Donna Zickefoose, et al
as 17-2232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FRIEDLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, FORT DIX FCI HEALTH SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
