Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Amos Singleton v. Robinson, et al
as 16-4058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMOS SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBINSON and WENDY SHAYLOR
Curry Robinson v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 16-3893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURRY ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VINCENT DEFELICE, Unit Manager and others
Jason Parker v. Darnell Gregory, et al
as 16-3141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DARNELL GREGORY, DIRECTOR, MR., CLEVELAND, MR. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ROBINSON, O.C. SUPERVISOR MS. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. E. Hall, et al
as 16-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E. HALL, Lt., MARCHANELLO, Lt., BITENER, Lt. and others
Mark Robinson v. John Wetzel, et al
as 15-3410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary, DOC and DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer
Gregory Robinson v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 15-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY F. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, LT. TRADER, LT. MARK D. DAUM and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, MAJOR SCAROBOROUGH, STAFF LT. KAREN HAWKINS and others
Timothy Robinson v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 15-2443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FAIRTON FCI
Robert Robinson v. District Attorney Philadelphia
as 15-2367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Hareem Mitchell v. Roswell, et al
as 15-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAREEM D. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE ROSWELL, employed at the Dover Police Departmenbt of the City of Dover, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Vincent Robinson v. Richard Andrews, et al
as 15-1285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT LEE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ANDREWS and MICHAEL R. GAVIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
