Cases 31 - 40 of 54
De Shawn Drumgo v. Reginald Brown, et al
as 12-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DE SHAWN DRUMGO
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BROWN, THOMPSON, JAMES THOMAS and others
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
Jeffrey Krahn v. State of Delaware, et al
as 11-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY KRAHN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, SCOTT MEIXELL, CHRISTOPHER ALBENCE, PO and others
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Derrick Brown v. David Kustoff, et al
as 11-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID KUSTOFF, EDWARD L. STANTON, III, STATE OF TENNESSEE and others
Derrick Brown v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 11-2751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Timothy Hatten v. D. Young, et al
as 11-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
D YOUNG, W. ZEGARSKI, J. ADIMI and others
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 10-4754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and offical capacities, PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
Detlef Hartmann v. Thomas Carroll, et al
as 10-3069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS CARROLL, Warden, JOHN SCRANTON, STANLEY TAYLOR, Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
