Cases 31 - 40 of 2,996
Zumar DuBose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1615
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE and ABDUSH DUBOSE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John McDonald v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 24-1650
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE MCDONALD
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, WARDEN FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Gustavo Velez-Hernandez v. District Attorney Lehigh County, et al
as 24-1642
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO D. VELEZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
William Neal v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1628
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEAL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Dwight Hill v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1636
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT M. HILL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Daniel Stoffa v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1638
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STOFFA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent SCI Greene, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAYETTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Carl Holdren v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1617
Plaintiff:
CARL J. HOLDREN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Gerald Bush v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1616
Plaintiff:
GERALD BUSH
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Elwood Small v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-1592
Plaintiff:
ELWOOD SMALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Thomas Dewald v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 24-1580
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
