Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Francis Harris v. Craig Steadman
as 15-3007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG W. STEADMAN
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Craig Szemple v. Rutgers, The State University, et al
as 15-1499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY LANIGAN, Commissioner, NJDOC and others
Joseph Malcomb v. Craig McKean, et al
as 14-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG MCKEAN, Pennsylvania State Police and JOSHUA THOMAS, Pennsylvania State Police
USA v. Craig Brown
as 14-4026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CRAIG BROWN
Craig Alford v. Laquise
as 14-3350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LAQUISE, Hearing Examiner, DORINA VARNER, Chief Hearing Examiner, JOHN WETZEL and others
Craig Alford v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 14-2944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and MARK STEVEN MATTHEWS
Johnson Obiegbu v. Warden Loretto FCI, et al
as 14-1711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNSON OBIEGBU
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LORETTO FCI, J. TRIMBATH, S. BURKE and others
Craig Williams v. Sec PA Dept Corrections, et al
as 14-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG WILLIAMS, PADRP
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Coordinator, TINA FRIDAY, Records Officer, in her Individual and Official Capacity and others
Craig Kinard v. Bakos, et al
as 14-1138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG KINARD
Defendant:
SECURITY LIEUTENANT BAKOS and THOMPSON, Doctor, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
