Cases 51 - 60 of 2,112
Kai Ingram v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
Armoni Johnson v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1476
Plaintiff:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
James Wolfe v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 24-1462
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. WOLFE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jose Mendez v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1472
Plaintiff:
JOSE MENDEZ
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Robert Benney v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1436
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Jerome Washington v. Link, et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LINK, SCI Graterford, Superintendent, VOORHEES, CO, PETTERS, III, SCI Graterford, SGT. and others
Dale Arnold v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1423
Plaintiff:
DALE ARNOLD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Karl Manuel v. Mark Capozza, et al
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK CAPOZZA, C/O SERGEANT WILES, C/O. LT. DAILEY and others
Montez Bethea v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1372
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ BETHEA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
