Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Henry Stubbs, III v. Greg Skrepenak, et al
as 22-2277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
GREG SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A URBAN and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES, THOMAS L. AMBRO and others
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. EBBERT, IAN CONNERS, J. RAY ORMOND and others
Leon Green v. USA, et al
as 17-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, ELISABETH K.H. PASQUALINI and others
Jose Perez v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 13-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE, Superintendent, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Sean Pressley v. C. Blaine, et al
as 12-3888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN PRESSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE
Percy St. George v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 12-3446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY ST. GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and CONNER BLAINE
Darien Houser v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 12-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARIEN HOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
EDWARD CAMERON, ADA, COLLIN BURKE, ADA, BETH C. GROSSMAN, ADA and others
Jose Perez v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 11-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE, Superintendent, ATTY GEN PA and DA LANCASTER
Myron Gibbs v. Brendan O'Neill, et al
as 11-2115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYRON V. GIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDAN O'NEILL, KEVIN J. O'CONNELL and TODD E CONNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
