Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
In re: Erick Pringle, et al
as 22-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant: In re: ERICK PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee: ELON MUSK, AMAZON INC, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Defendant: BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW CUOMO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1650
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stanley Caterbone, et al v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 17-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant: STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Plaintiff - Appellee: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Defendant - Appellee: PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, NSA, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY, DARPA and others
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2791
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: SOO C. SONG, J. ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT S. CESSAR and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2787
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2788
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2795
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2792
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: SOO C. SONG, J. ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?