Cases 1 - 8 of 8
James Biggins v. Robert Burns, et al
as 14-4582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
ROBERT M. BURNS, BERRY BURNMAN, JOHN BURTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA, RONALD L. WILEY, JAMES SCARBOROUGH and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 14-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLEIN and others
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 14-1667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and official capacities, WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Charles Monroe v. Christopher Klein, et al
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff, MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer, BENSON, Staff and others
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 10-4754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and offical capacities, PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
