Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kevin Coit v. L. Malichaik, et al
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
L. MALICHAIK, RLPM, BOBBI JO SALAMON, Superintendent, M. ROWE, DSCS and others
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Jerome Washington v. Salamon, et al
as 23-3053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SALAMON, Over All SCI-Rockview CorrectionalOfficials and Inmates Custody, Care and Control, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT ROWE, LIEUTENANT SEYMOUR and others
Jerome Washington v. Rowe, et al
as 23-3060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DSCS ROWE, Deputy Superintendent and KNAPP, Captain, Unit Manager
Joshua Graham v. Mark Rowe, et al
as 21-1053
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ROWE and CITY OF VINELAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA MICHAEL GRAHAM
Braxton Cooper v. John Wetzel, et al
as 17-3074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAXTON COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ROWE, JUDGE BRIGHT and others
Braxton Cooper v. John Wetzel, et al
as 17-1859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAXTON COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ROWE, JUDGE BRIGHT and others
Gregory Rowe v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 17-1650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ALAN ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PIKE COUNTY
Nicholas Pracht v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 16-3169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS ALBERT PRACHT
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KENNETH CAMERON, WUJUOLA and others
Anthony Rowe v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 14-3496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHN ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
