Cases 121 - 130 of 233
Joseph Paige v. Warden Federal Bureau of Priso
as 13-4723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PAIGE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Johnny Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-4526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, SHOULTZ, Officer, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE and others
Frederick Banks v. United Safety Service, et al
as 13-4452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS, AN AMERICAN INDIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Edward Ford, Jr. v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-4419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD J. FORD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Director Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-4304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR BUREAU OF PRISONS
Ronald Smith v. United States Parole Commissio, et al
as 13-4045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD RICHARD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Chandar Snow v. USA, et al
as 13-3979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANDAR A. SNOW
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Regional Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE and others
In re: Arnold Reeve
as 13-3597
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant - Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
David Kates v. USP Lewisburg Warden, et al
as 13-3580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
USP LEWISBURG WARDEN and DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
In re: Samuel Opara
as 13-3323
Petitioner:
In re: SAMUEL OPARA
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
