Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 771
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant: DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2609
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2610
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Minehan v. Eric McDowell, et al
as 23-2737
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN MINEHAN, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Christi Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC G. MCDOWELL, ANDREW T. LUNNEY, MCFADDEN SCOTT INSURANCE LLC and others
W. Pedder v. Commissioner Social Security
as 23-2386
Plaintiff / Appellant: W. SCOTT PEDDER
Defendant / Appellee: COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 23-2724
Petitioner: In re: SANDRA RUMANEK
Respondent: BERNARD G. CONAWAY, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
USA v. Adam Scott
as 23-2769
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ADAM SCOTT
James Mosley v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 23-2406
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN D. GREEN, Former Sheriff, SCOTT MENDELSOHN, ELKINS PARK ABSTRACT CO and others
Defendant: JOHN D. GREEN
Geoffrey Scott v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2697
Petitioner: GEOFFREY HOWARD CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 23-8038
Respondent: BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Petitioner: M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, ROBERT G. WILMERS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?