Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomas Liddell v. New Jersey Department of Corre, et al
as 16-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LIDDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner, BERNARD GOODWIN, ADMINISTRATOR and others
Joseph Aruanno v. Bernard Goodwin, et al
as 13-3342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD GOODWIN and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Gilbert Greenfield, Jr. v. Jon Corzine, et al
as 12-2101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT THOMAS GREENFIELD, JR., Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GOV. JOHN CORZINE, GEORGE HAYMAN, GRACE ROGERS and others
Michael Hasher v. Bernard Goodwin, et al
as 11-1092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HASHER
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD GOODWIN, Supr [DOC]. AT: STU and GREGG CONWAY, Admin. DOC
Joseph Aruanno v. Merrill Main, et al
as 10-3382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL MAIN, Director of Psychology, CYNTHIA SWEENY, Administrator, GRACE ROGERS, Administrator and others
Charles Slaughter v. Brown
as 10-2911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SLAUGHTER, a/k/a Umar M. Alikhan
Defendant - Appellee:
GRACE ROGERS, Administrator, GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner, RONALD H. CATHEL, Administrator and others
Charles Slaughter v. Grace Rogers, et al
as 10-1637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SLAUGHTER, AKA Umar M. Alikhan
Defendant - Appellee:
GRACE ROGERS, ADMINISTRATOR, GEORGE HAYMAN, COMMISSIONER, BERNARD GOODWIN, ASST. ADMINISTRATOR and others
Joseph Aruanno v. Merrill Main, et al
as 10-1252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL MAIN, Director of Psychology, CYNTHIA SWEENY, Administrator, GRACE ROGERS, Administrator and others
R.W. v. Bernard Goodwin
as 09-2814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R.W.
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD GOODWIN, Administrator, Specil Treatment Unit
Michael Hasher v. Bernard Goodwin
as 09-2551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HASHER
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD GOODWIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
