Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ronald Koons, et al v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant: AARON SIEGEL, JASON COOK, JOSEPH DELUCA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: RONALD KOONS, NICHOLAS GAUDIO, JEFFREY M. MULLER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Not Yet Classified: PRESIDENT NEW JERSEY STATE SENATE and SPEAKER OF THE NEW JERSEY GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Appellee: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Amicus Curiae: IAN AYRES, FREDERICK VARS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Mario Johnson v. Sa'nya Johnson, et al
as 23-1411
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIO AMIR JOHNSON, Moor beneficiary
Defendant: SA'NYA MONE' JOHNSON, Estate Beneficiary, SHAR'DAE CAMILLE JOHNSON, Estate Beneficiary, GREYSON AMOS CALDWELL, Estate Beneficiary and others
Jamal Parker v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 23-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor Beneficiary a a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propria Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior et al, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Attorney General et al, ANDREW SAUL, d/b/a Commissioner et al and others
Sherice Sargent, et al v. School District of Philadelphia, et al
as 22-2493
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHERICE SARGENT, Individually, as next friend of her minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated, MICHELE SHERIDAN, Individually, as next friend of her minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated and JOSHUA MEYER, Individually, as next friend of his minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee: FALLON GIRINI, Individually, as next friend of her minor child, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Stanley Caterbone v. Lancaster City Police Departme, et al
as 22-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant: STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant / Appellee: LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and BARRY HANDWERGER, Solicitor for Lancaster City Police, Mayors Office
Defendant: LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE DONALD TOTARO, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, MARK WILSON, Director of Lancaster County Adult Probation and others
Old Dominion Electric Cooperat v. FERC
as 22-1158
Petitioner: OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Not Yet Classified: BUCKEYE POWER INC, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL, OFFICE OF PEOPLES COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Pennsylvania Public Utility Co, et al v. FERC
as 21-3243
Petitioner: PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
Intervenor: MONITORING ANALYTICS LLC
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Not Yet Classified: EXELON CORP, EXELON GENERATION CO LLC, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL and others
USA v. State of Delaware Department o We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-3008
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Appellant: ARIZONA CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, CAPTIVE INSURANCE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DELAWARE CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION INC and others
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al v. United States Postmaster Gener, et al
as 20-3419
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MAINE and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAIRMAN POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, UNITED STATES POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 19-1803
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN R. DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?