Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Damien Schlager v. John Wetzel
as 24-1900
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN M. SCHLAGER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Department of Corrections (Official and Individual Capacity)
Alvin White, Jr. v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1770
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GEORGE WHITE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MELINDA ADAMS and MARCIA COMBINE
Jamar Travillion v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1763
Plaintiff:
JAMAR L. TRAVILLION
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, in his official capacity as the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Secretary of Corrections, OFFICER STOVER, in his individual capacity, OFFICER LOSE, in his individual capacity and others
Joel Muir v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1754
Plaintiff:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J. FREEMAN and others
Andy Buxton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1405
Plaintiff:
ANDY BUXTON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MALINDA L. ADAMS, KAREN FEATHER and others
Casey Dooley v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
CASEY DOOLEY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, RICHARD A. GOSS, JESSICA COUSINS and others
Charles TalbertIn re: Charles Talbert
as 23-3228
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of PA Department of Corrections, SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY and others
Gabriel Rosa-Diaz v. John Rivello, et al
as 23-3176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN RIVELLO, Deputy Superintendent Facility Management, J. LUTHER, Facility Manager, C. WAKEFIELD, Deputy Superintendent Centralize Services and others
Shariff ButlerIn re: Shariff Butler
as 23-3169
Petitioner:
In re: SHARIFF BUTLER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Former Secretary of Department of Corrections, KEVIN KAUFFMAN, Former Superintendent at SCI - Huntingdon, C. KENDRICK, Captain/Shift Commander at SCI - Huntingdon and others
William Curtis v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL and STEWART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
