Cases 1 - 10 of 1,007
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bouazza Ouaziz v. Phil Murphy, et al
as 24-1867
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, Governor of New Jersey - Individually and Personal Capacity, SARAH ADILMAN, Chief Executive of Department of Human Service, FRANK MEZZA, Deputy Director Department of Family Service Hudson County - Individually and Personal Capacity and others
Jeffrey Goodwin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 24-1852
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. GOODWIN, n his capacity as trustee of the Dorothy M. Goodwin Trust
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, d/b/a Chase Bank
Adam Urda v. Jeffrey Sosko
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
ADAM URDA
Defendant:
JEFFREY SOSKO, in his official and individual capacities
Carl Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff:
CARL E. RODGERS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JEFFREY STINE, DEAN SHIPE and others
Jeffrey Baron, et al v. Hanover Insurance Co, et al
as 24-1720
Plaintiff:
ESQ. JEFFREY I. BARON and BARON & BRENNAN PC
Defendant:
HANOVER INSURANCE CO and NAUTILUS INSURANCE CO
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Chapman Chevrolet LLC, et al
as 24-1691
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
CHAPMAN CHEVROLET LLC and GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al
as 24-1690
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC, TRANSUNION LLC and others
Jeffrey Herrera v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 24-1663
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HERRERA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
