Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2628
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2338
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leroy Smith v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-1521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY L. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Linda Wright v. USA, et al
as 22-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Defendant:
ARBORS REHABILITATION, -TEXAS, DEXTER GOEI, LONE TREE CONVALESCENT and others
Denise Kelly v. Barry Szamboti, et al
as 19-1884
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL and PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL UROLOGY TEAM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE KELLY
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY KEVIN BIDLINGMAIER, WARWICK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Smith v. Sweden Valley, et al
as 15-3413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SWEDEN VALLEY, LLC, CHRISTOPHER BRENNEN, FREDERICK P. MILLIRON and others
William Smith v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 15-2982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
William Smith v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 15-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
