Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kingfly Spirits, et al v. Blake Ragghianti, et al
as 23-2913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINGFLY SPIRITS, FDBA Port of Pittsburgh Distillery LLC, MARK WILSON and EBBREZZA INC
Defendant / Appellee:
BLAKE RAGGHIANTI, DAVID S. KLETT, JUSTINA TUSHAK and others
Stanley Caterbone v. Lancaster City Police Departme, et al
as 22-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant / Appellee:
LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and BARRY HANDWERGER, Solicitor for Lancaster City Police, Mayors Office
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE DONALD TOTARO, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, MARK WILSON, Director of Lancaster County Adult Probation and others
IMPRELIS HERBICIDE MARKETING
as 17-3114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. DEPIETRI and BETH A. DEPIETRI
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO
Imprelis Herbicide Marketing, et al
as 17-3009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARONIMINK GOLF CLUB INC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO
In re: Imprelis Herbicide Mark, et al
as 17-2981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMPSTER ROSS and GAILE ROSS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO and DUPONT PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS USA
Imprelis Herbicide Marketing, et al
as 15-4056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellant:
QUEENPIN LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO and DUPONT PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS USA
In re: Imprelis Herbicide Marketing, et al
as 13-4425
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK WILSON
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE ZWACH
Defendant - Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO and DUPONT PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS USA
Imprelis Herbicide Marketing, et al
as 13-4345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. KIPPHORN, JR. and BARBARA A. KIPPHORN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO and DUPONT PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
