Cases 1 - 10 of 318
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western Distr
as 24-2251
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Margo Weems, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2333
Defendant:
FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES LLC, ATA, MARGARET T. MURPHY, JENNIFER COLE, Forensic Mental Health Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARGO A. WEEMS, and her child TMW
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Katherine Emery
as 24-2270
Defendant:
JUDGE KATHERINE B. EMERY
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
as 24-2269
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western Distr
as 24-2252
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Gina Obarto
as 24-2253
Defendant:
GINA OBARTO
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County
as 24-2266
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Prothonotary Office of Westmoreland County
as 24-2267
Defendant:
PROTHONOTARY OFFICE OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Court Administration Office of Westmoreland County
as 24-2250
Defendant:
COURT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Eddy Martinez Allqui, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2166
Petitioner:
EDDY ROBERTO MARTINEZ ALLQUI, MARIA DE LOS ANGELES CAIZA PILAMUNGA, M. A. M. C. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
