Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 100 of 10,406
GILBERT VS MALLIOS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01387
Plaintiff: MITCHELL GILBERT
Defendant: JDG CHRISTOPHER MALLIOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01472
Plaintiff: RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES and THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAYNOR v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01842
Plaintiff: GILBERT RYAN RAYNOR
Defendant: COMCAST CORPORATION and DREAMWORKS ANIMATION STUDIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDAWAY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff: AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: GARVIN
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff: UMAR GARVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff: RONNIE LISTER
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHESTNUT v. ACP/467 et al
as 2:2024cv01674
Plaintiff: TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant: ACP/467, CHIDIALDI EZENGWU, CHANELL PRATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. U.S. MARSHALLS
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff: PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant: U.S. MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
IN RE: SMITH
as 2:2024cv01787
Plaintiff: JERRY SMITH, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINCLAIR v. RADIO
as 5:2024cv01514
Plaintiff: PETER SINCLAIR
Defendant: RONALD RADIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?