Cases 31 - 40 of 10,408
IN RE: RODNEY BESSON
as 5:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BESSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv02235
Plaintiff:
NAEEM WALLER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE DENNIS DUSAK, JAMES GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAMES v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 2:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JAMES
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NAILS v. CSL PLASMA
as 2:2024cv02131
Plaintiff:
ANGELA NAILS
Defendant:
CSL PLASMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COVINGTON v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICER DOUGLAS WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Womack v. Farid #325 et al
as 2:2024cv02174
Plaintiff:
Jahmaige Womack
Defendant:
Officer Bassam Farid #325, Officer Mullarkey and THE CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bitler v. ROBESON TOWNSHIP
as 5:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bitler, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATEN v. THE CITY OF PHILADLPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
HAROLD STATEN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DETECTIVE JAMES J. MCNESBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE TRACY BRANDEIS ROMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudwell et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Malika Hudwell, Ikeem Adams, Malika Hudwell on behalf of minor children Z.H.T. and N.H.A. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
