Cases 61 - 70 of 76
MOORE v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
as 2:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
JERRICE MOORE
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIHADEH v. SMEAL
as 2:2010cv05674
Plaintiff:
MOUSA SHIHADEH
Defendant:
SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAEMER v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv04868
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KRAEMER
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AMY DERAYMOND-FONTNO, MANNY FONTNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KATONA v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2010cv04407
Plaintiff:
NICOLAS P. KATONA
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, TERENCE FARRELL and SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HELLYER v. COUNTY OF BUCKS et al
as 2:2010cv02724
Plaintiff:
NANCY HELLYER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUCKS, TERRENCE MOORE, HARRIS GUBERNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACKRIDGE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv02420
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE ACKRIDGE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCCLOSKY, CURTIS MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv03455
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MOORE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR PHILA., DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIPRESSI v. BRISTOL BOROUGH et al
as 2:2010cv01584
Plaintiff:
JOANNE CIPRESSI
Defendant:
BRISTOL BOROUGH, SAMUEL C. ANDERSON, ARNOLD A. PORTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MADISON v. FAIRMOUNT COMMUNITY HEALTH et al
as 2:2010cv01292
Plaintiff:
YVETTE MADISON
Defendant:
FAIRMOUNT COMMUNITY HEALTH and SHARON MOORE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HOLZWORTH v. MOORE
as 2:2009cv05085
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOLZWORTH
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TERRANCE MOORE, JEFFREY TOMLINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
