Cases 71 - 80 of 223
BENNETT v. ARAMARK
as 2:2019cv00444
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BENNETT
Defendant:
ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
HARRISON v. PELHAM COURT LP et al
as 2:2018cv03431
Defendant:
PELHAM COURT LP and RUSHMORE MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOMACK et al v. PENNROSE MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv03195
Plaintiff:
DEVONDRIAN WOMACK, MELLISSA WOMACK and MELISSA WOMACK
Defendant:
OXFORD VILLAGE and PENNROSE MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DOE v. THE LIFE CENTER OF EASTERN DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv03404
Defendant:
THE LIFE CENTER OF EASTERN DELAWARE COUNTY and COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF DELAWARE COUNTY, INC.
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (f)(3)(C) Fair Housing Amendments Act
GRAHAM v. AETNA, INC.
as 5:2018cv02027
Plaintiff:
LESLIE GRAHAM
Defendant:
AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CORONADO v. SEQUENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL (STI), LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01990
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA CORONADO
Defendant:
SEQUENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL (STI), LLC and COWORKX STAFFING SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COLEMAN v. CEDAR WOODS CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2018cv01961
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY COLEMAN
Defendant:
CEDAR WOODS CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TRIPATHI v. MURANO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
as 2:2018cv01840
Plaintiff:
AKHILESH TRIPATHI
Defendant:
MURANO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and JERRY MINGIONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAMB v. PRECISION POLYMER PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2018cv00434
Plaintiff:
MONICA LAMB
Defendant:
PRECISION POLYMER PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TANG v. WYNNEWOOD VALLEY HOME OWNER'S ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2017cv05744
Plaintiff:
JIAN TANG
Defendant:
WYNNEWOOD VALLEY HOME OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, BARRY PENN, THOMAS NEWMASTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
