Cases 191 - 200 of 657
MCS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BIG LOTS, INC.
as 5:2013cv06753
Plaintiff:
MCS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
BIG LOTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. v. PACCAR, INC.
as 2:2013cv06383
Plaintiff:
DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
PACCAR, INC.
Counter_claimant:
PACCAR, INC.
Counter_defendant:
DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WOODSTREAM CORPORATION v. ATLANTIS HYDROPONICS, INC.
as 5:2013cv06371
Plaintiff:
WOODSTREAM CORPORATION
Defendant:
ATLANTIS HYDROPONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
FERRING B.V. v. MYLAN, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05909
Plaintiff:
FERRING B.V.
Defendant:
MYLAN, INC., MYLAN PHARAMACEUTICALS, INC. and MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUNKER v. MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04606
Plaintiff:
LARRY G JUNKER
Defendant:
MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC. and MARTECH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TEKNI-PLEX, INC. et al v. CAIN et al
as 5:2013cv04502
Plaintiff:
TEKNI-PLEX, INC. and TRI-SEAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant:
R. MICHAEL CAIN and TAB-IT LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
WILSON v. THERMOS MOTORSPORTS
as 5:2013cv04433
Plaintiff:
STEVEN V. WILSON
Defendant:
THERMOS MOTORSPORTS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BROS. et al v. SIMON
as 5:2013cv04000
Plaintiff:
CLAIR BROS. , AUDIO ENTERPRISES, INC. and CONCERTSONICS, LLC
Defendant:
FRANK SIMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
KASON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DENT DESIGN HARDWARE, LTD.
as 5:2013cv03809
Plaintiff:
KASON INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
DENT DESIGN HARDWARE, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION v. ATWOOD
as 2:2013cv03495
Plaintiff:
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
Defendant:
BRYAN L. ATWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
