Cases 111 - 120 of 245
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ADVANTAGE POINT, LP v. BOROUGH OF KUTZTOWN et al
as 5:2014cv05517
Plaintiff:
ADVANTAGE POINT, LP
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF KUTZTOWN , KUTZTOWN MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY , PEGGY DEVLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04454
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04307
Plaintiff:
JAMAL WATSON , MARY WATSON and WILLIAM WATSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT , JEREMY OLESIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
WILSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv03932
Plaintiff:
RAEKWON WILSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GREEN and SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. CHESTER UPLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2014cv03685
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZO GREEN
Defendant:
CHESTER UPLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT and THE CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GREEN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. AICHELE et al
as 2:2014cv03299
Plaintiff:
GREEN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA , LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA , WILLIAM REDPATH and others
Defendant:
CAROL AICHELE and JONATHAN MARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv03119
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GIBSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RICHARD GREEN and MATTHEW HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
