Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DELVILA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
JUAN DELVILA , JUAN SOLER , TONY MASON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CRUZ et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
JOEL CRUZ , ADALERTO MORALES RODRIGUEZ and JOSHUA MORALES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRONS et al v. CAREY et al
as 2:2015cv01953
Plaintiff:
KALITA IRONS , TYRONE IRONS and TYLIAH IRONS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CAREY , JAMES NOLAN and THE CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADSHAW v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2014cv05496
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
VINCENT MOONEY, MIKE MILLER, CHARLES STETLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES et al v. WALKER et al
as 2:2013cv05752
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN BARNES , JAHLIL FRENCH and ISIAH WHITE
Defendant:
JEFFREY WALKER, JEFFREY G. GALAZKA, CARLOS BUITRAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BENNETT v. U.S. MARSHALLS et al
as 2:2012cv06199
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALLS, JOHN, STEVE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUNCAN v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
RAHNEISHA DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER , WILLIAM CAREY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
